|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar |
Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar
Chapter 1 - Attorneys and Counselors
Appendix 1-A - Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings
Article Rule 1. Jurisdiction of the Court in the Discipline of Lawyers and the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Section Sec 1.3 - Discipline for Act Contrary to Prescribe Standards of Conduct
Cite as: O.S. §, __ __
Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings.
Chapter 1, App. 1-A
Rule 1. Jurisdiction of the Court in the Discipline of Lawyers and the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
§1.3. Discipline for Act Contrary to Prescribe Standards of Conduct.
The commission by any lawyer of any act contrary to prescribed standards of conduct, whether in the course of his professional capacity, or otherwise, which act would reasonably be found to bring discredit upon the legal profession, shall be grounds for disciplinary action, whether or not the act is a felony or misdemeanor, or a crime at all. Conviction in a criminal proceeding is not a condition precedent to the imposition of discipline.
Historical Data
Adopted by orders February 23, 1981; eff. July 1, 1981.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document| Cite | Name | Level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases | |||
| Cite | Name | Level | |
| 2001 OK 14, 19 P.3d 287, 72 OBJ 560, | STATE ex. rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSN. v. DICK | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 22, 66 P.3d 390, | STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. SERATT | Discussed | |
| 2003 OK 31, 72 P.3d 10, | STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. ARNOLD | Discussed at Length | |
| 2003 OK 36, 84 P.3d 708, | STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HEINEN | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 56, 71 P.3d 18, | STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. TAYLOR | Cited | |
| 1999 OK 28, 978 P.2d 70, 70 OBJ 1068, | State ex. rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Biggers | Cited | |
| Cite | Name | Level |
|---|
| None Found. |