|   |   | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar | 
 Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
   Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar
Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar
     Chapter 1 - Attorneys and Counselors
Chapter 1 - Attorneys and Counselors
       Appendix 1-A - Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings
Appendix 1-A - Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings
         Article Rule 11. Reinstatement
Article Rule 11. Reinstatement
         Section Sec 11.4                  - Standard of Proof for Petitions for Reinstatement
Section Sec 11.4                  - Standard of Proof for Petitions for Reinstatement
Cite as:  O.S. §, __  __
Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings.
Chapter 1, App. 1-A
Rule 11. Reinstatement.
§11.4. Standard of Proof for Petitions for Reinstatement.
An applicant for reinstatement must establish affirmatively that, if readmitted or if the suspension from practice is removed, the applicant's conduct will conform to the high standards required of a member of the Bar. The severity of the original offense and the circumstances surrounding it shall be considered in evaluating an application for reinstatement. The burden of proof, by clear and convincing evidence, in all such reinstatement proceedings shall be on the applicant. An applicant seeking such reinstatement will be required to present stronger proof of qualifications than one seeking admission for the first time. The proof presented must be sufficient to overcome the Supreme Court's former judgment adverse to the applicant. Feelings of sympathy toward the applicant must be disregarded. If applicable, restitution, or the lack thereof, by the applicant to an injured party will be taken into consideration by the Trial Panel on an application for reinstatement. Further, if applicable, the Trial Panel shall satisfy itself that the applicant complied with Rule 9.1 of these Rules.
Historical Data
Adopted by order of February 23, 1981, eff. July 1, 1981.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document| Cite | Name | Level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases | |||
| Cite | Name | Level | |
| 2002 OK 78, 59 P.3d 510, | IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF BLEVINS | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 9, 65 P.3d 275, | IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF SWANT | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 28, 66 P.3d 416, | IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF HOLDEN | Discussed | |
| 2003 OK 40, 68 P.3d 982, | IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF COLSON | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 41, 68 P.3d 987, | IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF HENDERSON | Cited | |
| 2003 OK 61, 72 P.3d 27, | STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GIGER | Discussed | |
| Cite | Name | Level | 
|---|
| None Found. |