OSCN LOGO
Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help
 
Title 6. Banks and Trust Companies

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
  Title 6. Banks and Trust Companies
    Chapter 1 - Oklahoma Banking Code
        Article Article II - Banking Department
        Section 207 - Judicial Review of Orders of the Banking Board or the Commissioner
Cite as: O.S. §, __ __




A. Final orders of the Board or the State Banking Commissioner may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma by any party directly affected and showing aggrievement by the order. A mere increase in competition resulting from the order shall not constitute aggrievement.

B. An appeal shall be commenced by filing with the clerk of the Supreme Court, within thirty (30) days from the date of the order or decision, a petition in error with a copy of the order or decision appealed from. The time limit prescribed herein for filing the petition in error may not be extended. The manner of perfection of the record of the proceedings to be reviewed and the time for its completion shall be in accordance with rules prescribed by the Supreme Court.

C. 1. A necessary jurisdictional prerequisite to the acceptance of the appeal by the Supreme Court shall include an affirmative showing of aggrievement from the record, by reference in the petition in error, which cannot be a mere increase in competition.

2. The appeal must be perfected by the posting of a bond by the appellant in a reasonable amount not to exceed the amount of reasonably projected gross income for four (4) years in the case of a branch, relocation, merger or acquisition, or an amount equal to the capital, surplus and undivided profits required to be paid in the case of a new charter. When the order being appealed is that of the Banking Board, the Board, in its sole discretion, shall set the amount of the bond. When the order being appealed is that of the Commissioner, the Commissioner, in the sole discretion of the Commissioner, shall set the amount of the bond. It is the obligation of the appellant to request that a bond amount be set and such request shall not postpone or extend the time period in which an appeal must be filed with the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

3. In the event the appellant is not the prevailing party in the appeal, the prevailing party may apply for an order assessing the bond in the amount demonstrated by such party to have been lost by reason of the delay caused by the appeal. The amount shall be based on the income projections in the original proceeding found to have been reasonable. The prevailing party shall make such application to the Board if the original order was issued by the Board or shall make such application to the Commissioner if the original order was issued by the Commissioner.

D. The Court shall give great weight to findings made and inferences drawn by the Board or Commissioner on questions of fact. The Court may affirm the decision or remand the case for further proceedings. Additionally, the Court may reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the findings, inferences or conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Historical Data


Added by Laws 1965, SB 1, c. 161, § 207; Amended by Laws 1970, SB 581, c. 316, § 1, emerg. eff. April 27, 1970; Amended by Laws 1978, SB 500, c. 161, § 1; Amended by Laws 1980, SB 556, c. 360, § 3, emerg. eff. June 27, 1980; Amended by Laws 1982, SB 583, c. 204, § 1; Amended by Laws 1995, HB 1454, c. 36, § 3, emerg. eff. July 1, 1995; Amended by Laws 1997, HB 2173, c. 111, § 9, emerg. eff. July 1, 1997 (superseded document available); Amended by Laws 1999, HB 1326, c. 27, § 3, emerg. eff. July 1, 1999 (superseded document available); Amended by Laws 2000, HB 2676, c. 205, § 4, emerg. eff. May 17, 2000 (superseded document available).

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1987 OK CIV APP 3, 735 P.2d 350, 58 OBJ 330, Proposed 1st City Bank of Healdton, Application ofDiscussed
 1983 OK CIV APP 17, 662 P.2d 317, Sisk v. Sanditen Investments, Ltd.Cited
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1987 OK 35, 737 P.2d 925, 58 OBJ 1234, Albright Title & Trust Co. v. Banking Bd. of State of Okl.Cited
 1993 OK 47, 852 P.2d 701, 64 OBJ 1270, Hurst v. EmpieCited
 1967 OK 151, 430 P.2d 794, CITIZENS NAT. BANK OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BANKING BD.Cited
 1969 OK 20, 452 P.2d 777, SEBRING v. CAPORALCited
 1970 OK 201, 476 P.2d 323, HAZEN v. BANKING BOARD OF STATECited
 1971 OK 26, 483 P.2d 731, VOSE v. BANKING BOARDDiscussed
 1995 OK 100, 905 P.2d 217, 66 OBJ 3048, Jackson v. FreemanCited
 1972 OK 123, 503 P.2d 550, VILLAGE BANK v. SEIKELCited
 1973 OK 76, 512 P.2d 166, BROWN v. BANKING BOARDDiscussed at Length
 1974 OK 33, 524 P.2d 14, IN RE BANK OF BIXBY v. BANKING BOARDCited
 1978 OK 75, 579 P.2d 1267, BROWN v. BANKING BOARDCited
 1981 OK 14, 627 P.2d 423, Citizens Sec. Bank & Trust v. Banking Bd. of State of Okl.Discussed at Length
 1982 OK 33, 642 P.2d 1141, Banking Bd. of State of Okl. v. WilkersonCited
 1999 OK 6, 976 P.2d 1042, 70 OBJ 471, Spiro State Bank v. First Poteau Corp.Cited
 1983 OK 9, 736 P.2d 993, Hale Computer Systems, Inc. v. Banking Bd. of State of Okl.Discussed at Length
 1984 OK 94, 700 P.2d 1011, Woods Petroleum Corp. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.Cited
 1985 OK 81, 708 P.2d 1089, 56 OBJ 2321, Bank of the Lakes, Langley, Okl. v. First State Bank, Ketchum, Okl.Discussed at Length
Title 6. Banks and Trust Companies
 CiteNameLevel
 6 O.S. 311, Appeal of Board's DecisionCited
 6 O.S. 506, Bank Holding Company Out-of-StateCited
Title 18. Corporations
 CiteNameLevel
 18 O.S. 381.79, Appeal of Final OrdersCited
 18 O.S. 381.26, BylawsCited
 18 O.S. 381.73, Acquisition of Control - Prohibited Transactions - Approval of Acquisition - Branching, Acquisition, and Conversion by Subsidiaries - Limitations and Restrictions - Applicable Law - Regulatory Supervision - Divestiture - Penalties - Judicial ReviewCited
 18 O.S. 381.74, Involuntary Liquidation by Commissioner - Notice - Omission of Hearing - Transfer of Assets - Liquidation - Commissioner's Powers and ExpensesDiscussed
 18 O.S. 381.78, Removal of Officer, Director, or Employee by Commissioner - Findings - AppealCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.