|   |   | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar | 
 Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
   Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar
Title 5. Attorneys and the State Bar
     Chapter 1 - Attorneys and Counselors
Chapter 1 - Attorneys and Counselors 
       Appendix 4 - Code of Judicial Conduct
Appendix 4 - Code of Judicial Conduct
         Section Rule 2.15 - Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
Section Rule 2.15 - Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct 
Cite as: 5 O.S. § Rule 2.15 (OSCN 2012), Appendix 4 - Code of Judicial Conduct
Code of Judicial Conduct
Chapter 1, App. 
4
Rule 2.15 Responding to Judicial and Lawyer 
Misconduct 
RULE 2.15
Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
(A) A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a substantial question regarding the judge's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
(B) A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.
(C) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.
(D) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.
COMMENT
[1] Taking action to address known misconduct is a judge's obligation. Paragraphs (A) and (B) impose an obligation on the judge to report to the appropriate disciplinary authority the known misconduct of another judge or a lawyer that raises a substantial question regarding the honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness of that judge or lawyer. Ignoring or denying known misconduct among one's judicial colleagues or members of the legal profession undermines a judge's responsibility to participate in efforts to ensure public respect for the justice system. This Rule limits the reporting obligation to those offenses that an independent judiciary must vigorously endeavor to prevent.
[2] A judge who does not have actual knowledge that another judge or a lawyer may have committed misconduct, but receives information indicating a substantial likelihood of such misconduct, is required to take appropriate action under paragraphs (C) and (D). Appropriate action may include, but is not limited to, communicating directly with the judge who may have violated this Code, communicating with a supervising judge, or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body. Similarly, actions to be taken in response to information indicating that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct may include but are not limited to communicating directly with the lawyer who may have committed the violation, or reporting the suspected violation to the appropriate authority or other agency or body.
Historical Data
Approved by order of the Supreme Court, 2010 OK 90, effective April 15, 2011.
Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document| Cite | Name | Level | 
|---|
| None Found. | 
| Cite | Name | Level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases | |||
| Cite | Name | Level | |
| 2010 OK 90, | IN RE: OKLAHOMA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT | Cited | |